• Products
    • Demos
    • TaskMap Standard
    • TaskMap Pro
    • Capture for Excel
    • TaskMap Central
    • Upgrade
  • Downloads
    • Trials
    • Templates
    • Free Role List
  • Training
    • Self-paced Tutorials
    • Online Seminars
    • Calendar
  • Solutions
    • ITIL Suite
    • SOX Expert Suite
    • SPM Roadmap
    • Consulting
    • Process Conversion
    • Process Templates
  • BPM Blog
    • Process Mapping
    • Process Discovery
    • Process Analysis
    • Improvement
    • Change Management
    • Articles
  • Support
    • Product Support
    • TaskMap
    • FAQ's
    • Contact
    • Self-Paced Tutorials
  • About
    • Contact
    • Partners & Resellers
    • Background

  • About the BPM Blog
  • BPM Blog Sitemap

BPM Blog

BPM made simpler

« The Case for a Blended Agile: Part 1–The Background
The Case for a Blended Agile: Part 3-What a blended approach looks like »

The Case for a Blended Agile: Part 2–Too much squabbling

Sep 20th, 2011 by TaskMap

The squabbling continues

Articles abound purporting the benefits and problems associated with one method or another. Agile has been no stranger to this criticism; however the search for innovation does not just lie in technology development, but also in the manufacturing process, itself. The difference being solely one way of doing the work, where in fact there are many.

The tremendous improvements that are core to Agile development include; transparent and continuous communication within development teams and customers; willingness to listen and integrate changing requirements and total interdependence of team members. These are foundational principals that should be a part of any project; regardless whether the end product is a software system or a residential home.

However, believing that Agile alone will instantly create a Kumbaya atmosphere for your project is not a good assumption. Team members also need structure to work successfully, and much the elements from other Project Management methods can be integrated with Agile to get the best of both worlds.

Imagine having an argument for which drink is best … coffee or milk? They are different but both serve a purpose to satisfy a need for refreshment, and provide nourishment; perhaps less nourishment in the case of coffee. The bottom line is many like to have both coffee and milk together. So goes it with Agile and Non-Agile Project Management methods; different but not incompatible.

Tags: agile development, agile project management, assumption, atmosphere, best of both worlds, bottom line, continuous communication, foundational principals, improvements, interdependence, manufacturing process, nourishment, project management methods, refreshment, software system, squabbling, stranger, team members, technology development, willingness

Posted in Project Management

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

  • Archives

    • March 2012 (1)
    • February 2012 (3)
    • January 2012 (4)
    • December 2011 (11)
    • November 2011 (16)
    • October 2011 (17)
    • September 2011 (20)
    • August 2011 (21)
    • July 2011 (21)
    • June 2011 (22)
    • May 2011 (22)
    • April 2011 (23)
    • March 2011 (26)
    • February 2011 (28)
    • January 2011 (31)
    • December 2010 (31)
    • November 2010 (20)
  • Recent Posts

    • Business Process Modeling
    • Education
    • The issue of organizational culture
    • A VERY SHORT HISTORY OF PROCESSES
    • Process Dashboards: Identifying and flagging risk levels
    • Process Dashboards: Analyzing timeframes
    • THE CASE FOR PROCESS DASHBOARDS
    • Is 2012 the year that version control finally takes hold?
    • How to listen carefully to your team–Reflective listening skills overview (Part 8)
    • How to listen carefully to your team–Reflective listening skills overview (Part 7)
    • How to listen carefully to your team–Reflective listening skills overview (Part 6)
    • How to listen carefully to your team–Reflective listening skills overview (Part 5)
    • How to listen carefully to your team–Reflective listening skills overview (Part 4)
    • How to listen carefully to your team–Reflective listening skills overview (Part 3)
    • How to listen carefully to your team–Reflective listening skills overview (Part 2)
    • How to listen carefully to your team–Reflective listening (Part 1)
    • TaskMap Update: version 4.0.5
    • BPM BLOG Summary for week ending 2 December 2011
    • The Tutorials are coming … the tutorials are coming
    • The psychology of spending and how it can help BPM ;-)
    • Happy Thanksgiving
    • BPM Blog–The need to refine
    • Processes as instruction tools
    • BPM Blog Weekly summary 11.18.2011 with video blog
    • Project and Processes (responses to the questions)
    • Projects and processes
    • Thinking things through
    • Happy 11.11.11 and BPM Blog summary
    • TaskMap Automated tutorial: TaskMap Capture for Excel
    • Customizing fields in TaskMap 4 Professional
    • Prioritization in your life
    • The need to refine
    • Happy Anniversary BPM Blog: A good first milestone
    • Training the trainers
    • Power
    • BPM Blog summary for week ending 28 October 2011
    • Customized process mapping
    • Agile methodology: The case for a blended Agile
    • Additional displays: Are they worth the money?
    • BPM Blog summary week ending 21 October 2011
    • Thoughts matter: How thoughts affect our actions in everyday life
    • BPM Summary of automated tutorials on the TaskMap menu
    • Automated tutorial—Save as process folder
    • Automated tutorial—Task Links and how to use them
    • Automated tutorial for Task Details
    • TaskMap Tutorial—Save as PowerPoint
    • Check my TaskMap
    • BPM Blog summary week ending 7 October 2011
    • Renumbering Tasks in TaskMap
    • Customizing roles names in TaskMap
    • Adding tasks to a Page–add task to page Dialog
    • How to add tasks to pages using the auto connect feature in TaskMap
    • BPM Blog Summary Week ending 30 September 2011
    • Towards Perfection
    • BPM in the Legal Profession
    • BPM BLOG SITE MAP
    • Rigor and our business processes
    • BPM Summary Week ending 23 September 2011. The Case for a Blended Agile
    • The Case for a Blended Agile: Part 4-Agile Stepping Stones Approach
    • The Case for a Blended Agile: Part 3-What a blended approach looks like
  • RSS Get the BPM RSS feed

  • Posts by category

    • Change Management
    • Compliance
    • Law Processes
    • Legal processes
    • Org Charts in Visio
    • Process Analysis
    • Process Discovery
    • Process Improvement
    • Process Mapping
    • Project Management
    • Uncategorized
  • Tags

    best practices bpm budget business analyst business process category change change management computing group dashboard decisions discovery discovery phase efficiency flowchart flowcharts goals and objectives governance harvard job management change management project map methodology mike cunningham milestones personality process documentation process improvement process mapping process maps project management project managers quality standards return on investment risk role names sox compliance target task library team members technorati time and money timeframe Visio willingness

Home • Products • Downloads • Templates • BPM Blog • Training • Contact Us • SiteMap

Copyright © Harvard Computing Group, Inc., 1994-2011. All Rights Reserved. TaskMap is a registered TradeMark of Harvard Computing Group.
Harvard Computing Group, 225 Cedar Hill Street, Suite 200, Marlborough, MA, 01752, USA Tel: 978-800-4590